<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Corporate Social Media A Failure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankvizeum.com.au/2008/07/28/is-corporate-social-media-a-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankvizeum.com.au/2008/07/28/is-corporate-social-media-a-failure/</link>
	<description>FRANkVizeum is a creatively-minded media agency designed for a world in transformation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://frankvizeum.com.au/2008/07/28/is-corporate-social-media-a-failure/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankmedia.com.au/2008/07/28/is-corporate-social-media-a-failure/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I think the issue in corporate social media lies around brands who are pretenders to the throne (i.e. the ones who *think* they&#039;re Nike, Apple etc. but are really No Frills and Homebrand). We basically don&#039;t want to be friends with 99% of brands out there.

What people forget is social networks are helping propel things that have always been popular. That can be niche interests like cross-stitching, but they&#039;re not inventing new ways to be entertained. Corporates whoa re looking for consumers to behave in a different way to the manner in which they always have are the ones who are losing the battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue in corporate social media lies around brands who are pretenders to the throne (i.e. the ones who *think* they&#8217;re Nike, Apple etc. but are really No Frills and Homebrand). We basically don&#8217;t want to be friends with 99% of brands out there.</p>
<p>What people forget is social networks are helping propel things that have always been popular. That can be niche interests like cross-stitching, but they&#8217;re not inventing new ways to be entertained. Corporates whoa re looking for consumers to behave in a different way to the manner in which they always have are the ones who are losing the battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Bensen</title>
		<link>http://frankvizeum.com.au/2008/07/28/is-corporate-social-media-a-failure/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Bensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankmedia.com.au/2008/07/28/is-corporate-social-media-a-failure/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank,
Thanks for linking to my list of responsibilities for a comm mgr.
I do know of one comm mgr in Australia for a parenting website.

Connie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank,<br />
Thanks for linking to my list of responsibilities for a comm mgr.<br />
I do know of one comm mgr in Australia for a parenting website.</p>
<p>Connie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 1.007 seconds using disk
Object Caching 131/267 objects using disk

Served from: frankvizeum.com.au @ 2010-09-09 11:52:59 -->